What does a human approval actually check?

When an agent asks for approval, do people have the information and time to catch the consequential action?

assistant-draftedMonitoring & control

Signals

Rests on one source

One deployment study found analysts reused an agent's drafts heavily (median 96.7% reuse across 108 coded tickets from six analysts).

Fide agenda

Central to FID-076's comparison of approval rules and evidence-sensitive policies.

Why it matters

Human approval is the default control for consequential agent actions. If it is a rubber stamp, the control is weaker than it looks.

Hypothesis

Approval accuracy falls with approval volume and rises when the interface shows the consequential effect rather than the command.

A first study

A reviewer study with security practitioners approving simulated agent actions under different interfaces and loads.

Controls it would need

Consent and ethics review; synthetic actions; balanced benign and harmful cases.

What it could and could not claim

Would describe the tested interfaces and participants, not all approval workflows.