Desk/2025-W13

Week of Mar 24–30, 2025

4 records0 status changes on new evidence1 new findings

New findings

Defense & research

Mar 24, 2025
Google DeepMind's CaMeL defeats prompt injections by design with capability-based control and data flow
DefensePaperGoogle DeepMind, Google, ETH Zurich

Debenedetti and colleagues (Google, Google DeepMind, ETH Zurich) propose CaMeL, which extracts control flow from the trusted user query so untrusted data cannot change which actions run, and attaches capabilities to data to block unauthorized flows. On AgentDojo the first version reported 67% of tasks solved with provable security; the June 2025 revision, with newer models, reports 77% versus 84% for an undefended system.

Mar 24, 2025
Microsoft announces Security Copilot agents for phishing triage, alert triage and remediation
DefenseTool releaseMicrosoft, OneTrust, Aviatrix

Microsoft announced Microsoft-built Security Copilot agents, including a Phishing Triage Agent in Defender, alert triage agents in Purview, a Conditional Access Optimization Agent, a Vulnerability Remediation Agent in Intune and a Threat Intelligence Briefing Agent, plus five partner agents. Preview was planned from April 2025; the announcement contains no evaluation of agent accuracy.

Mar 30, 2025
Survey maps Model Context Protocol landscape, server lifecycle and security risks
DefensePaperarXiv

Hou, Zhao, Wang and Wang survey MCP's architecture, industry adoption and server lifecycle. The first version (March 2025) split the lifecycle into creation, operation and update phases and discussed security risks in each. A revision in October 2025 expanded this to four phases with 16 activities and a threat taxonomy of four attacker types and 16 threat scenarios, with case studies and per-phase safeguards.

Policy & standards

Mar 24, 2025
NIST AI 100-2 E2025 taxonomy adds a dedicated section on security of AI agents
PolicyStandardNIST, UK AI Security Institute, US Center for AI Standards and Innovation

NIST released the 2025 edition of its adversarial machine learning taxonomy, co-authored with the UK AI Security Institute and US AI Safety Institute staff. Unlike the 2023 edition, it includes a section on the security of agents, noting that tool-using agents are exposed to direct and indirect prompt injection and that hijacking can lead to arbitrary code execution or data exfiltration.