{
 "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
 "attribution": "Fide AI, Agentic Cyber Explorer",
 "url": "https://agentic-cyber-explorer.pages.dev/findings/ai-incident-reports-carry-unsupported-claims/",
 "asOf": "2026-09-26",
 "id": "ai-incident-reports-carry-unsupported-claims",
 "claim": "AI-written incident investigations can score better on reconstruction while keeping earlier conclusions the records do not support.",
 "evidenceKind": "measured",
 "scope": "One incident (DSEWiki), one benchmark's reports, and Fide AI's own claim judgments, which await independent human adjudication. It does not measure how security teams act on such reports.",
 "topics": [
  "incident-reporting",
  "eval-validity"
 ],
 "atlas": [
  "other-agents"
 ],
 "evidence": [
  {
   "event": "fide-dsewiki-ai-incident-reports-2026",
   "note": "61 follow-ups scored higher; 44 still carried an earlier flagged claim (34 excluding disputed judgments)."
  }
 ],
 "relations": [],
 "statusHistory": [
  {
   "status": "reported",
   "on": "2026-09-25",
   "why": "Fide AI's DSEWiki analysis.",
   "event": "fide-dsewiki-ai-incident-reports-2026",
   "kind": "evidence"
  }
 ],
 "halfLifeDays": 540,
 "wouldChange": "Independent human adjudication of the claim judgments, or the same analysis on another incident.",
 "fideQuestions": [
  "FID-077"
 ],
 "methods": [],
 "review": "assistant-drafted",
 "addedOn": "2026-09-25"
}